Showing posts with label July 8 2013. Show all posts
Showing posts with label July 8 2013. Show all posts

GO Train flooded in 1981 too. Media misses mark suggesting new normal for extreme weather and flooding.

GO Train flood 1981
Stranded GO Train on Richmond Hill line in 1981 in Don River flood plain.
Does this stranded GO Train in the Don River valley look familiar?:

It should. The same thing happened on July 8, 2013 in the same place.

Back when you were rocking to Queen/Bowie Under Pressure for the first time, Metrolinx was getting to know the flood risks for the Richmond Hill line that started in the late 1970's. These rain line flood risks were documented in the flood inquiry report for Premier Davis.

GO Train flood 2013
Stranded GO Train on Richmond Hill line in 2013 in Don River flood plain.
Fast forward to May 28-29, 2013 and there was a bigger flood in the same place. But it happened at night so no trains, no issue.

Fast forward a bit more to July 8, 2013 and we get this: another stranded GO Train in the same place. Exactly the same place? Wow!

Hello McFly! It's Back to the Future. Too bad GO Trains do not fly away like modified DeLorians do.

Metrolinx had to explain the 2013 incident as an unprecedented event. In fact, it was not unprecendented flooding, or rainfall, but unprecedented judgement to not monitor flood levels at the Todmonden river gauge beside the tracks. A sensor has been in place since 1962 and real time sensors were in place online for years (e.g., TRCA Todmorden gauge).

Under pressure no doubt to explain how known safety risks could be ignored for its workers and passengers, Metrolinx would take a page from Milli Vanilli and 'Blame it on the Rain".

Climate change, or extreme rainfall, is a  quick and easy scapegoat for everything that has gone wrong in flood risk management or municipal drainage design over the past 50 to 100 years. But it does not explain incidents that should be managed as well-known operational risks. So 2013 was a big year for 'Blurred Lines", both for Robin Thicke and also for evidence-based, data-driven reporting on flood risk factors.

Today there is widespread misreporting that water level sensors were installed on the Don River after the flash flood of 2013. Perhaps extra sensors have been installed? The truth is that they have been in place for a long time.

If we are going to have effective solutions to flood risk mitigation, we have to accurate in characterization of flood causes, whether it was deficient Keating Channel dredging in the early 1980's or operational decisions in 2013. Otherwise we will "Blame it on the Rain" like Milli Vanilli and concoct misguided solutions to problems that do not exist. Solutions that could be worse than useless and miss real effective opportunities for risk mitigation.

****

PS - the maximum short term rainfall intensity recorded at the long term climate station / rain gauge in downtown Toronto was in 1962 (22.4 mm over 5 minutes). It caused widespread flooding even when the city was not a fully developed or intensified as it is now. Flooding blocked roads and in my neighbourhood there were hundreds of flooded basements as well:


So there is not really a new normal for rainfall and flooding, just more of yesterday's extremes, accentuated with 24-hour cable news, 24-7 weather reporting, and cell phone videos to capture every popped manhole, soggy underpass, or puddle that occurs in a big storm.

Myth Busting on Climate Change and Flooding - aka Nutella is Really Sugar and Oil !

Healthy? or Bumgravy?
Media and advertising can convince you of anything. Like "Nutella is wholesome and good for you" - made with milk and nuts, when the first 2 ingredients are actually sugar and oil - its more like Bumgravy!

Here's our top list of myths (spread through the media like sweet, oily Nutella) about climate change and flooding that deserve some truth:

(1)

Myth: Rain intensity and frequency has increased due to climate change (MOECC, Environmental Commissioner of Ontario, Ontario Government, IBC, ICLR, etc.).
Infographic Bumgravy.
100% data-free !!!!

Truth, rain intensities are not increasing according to Environment and Climate Change Canada's published research based on the Engineering Climate Datasets (version 2.3).

(2)

Myth: Extreme weather events that occurred every 40 years are now occurring every 6 years due to climate change (IBC, ICLR in Telling the Weather Story).


Truth: Maybe worst blunder ever published! IBC / ICLR mixed up a theoretical bell curve shift with actual data - the worst part is they won't admit it and a chief economist at major Canadian bank has repeated the false data claim on historical trends.

(3)

Myth: We are having 20 times more storms now than we used to and that is causing insurance rates to go up.

Truth: The balance sheets of P&C companies is more complicated that this, especially plummeting fixed income earnings in a low interest rate environment that cannot offset underwriting losses anymore .. but that is off track. Environment and Climate Change Canada, through a complaint to the CBC Ombudsman, has corrected this bogus statement as we are not getting more storms. Period.

(4)

Known flood zone. Deeper flood weeks before on May 28-89.
Help stop the Bumgravy Train and tell the truth about flood
causes in Canada ! This was only between a 2 year and a 5 year
design flow rate for the Don River at the Todmorden gauge.
Myth: The GO Train Flood on July 8, 2013 was due to unprecedented conditions is evidence of climate change impacts to weather (Metrolinx, Environmental Commissioner of Ontario).

Truth: A higher flood occurred on May 28-29 just weeks before - so not unprecedented. It was less than a 5 year flood flow rate in the Don River per the Todmorden gauge records - so not a climate extreme. Rail flooding has been documented since the early 1980's flood inquiry to Premier Davis. This was an operational mistake, sending a train into a documented high risk zone at the wrong time during a moderate flow event.

(5)

Myth: Aging infrastructure is reducing capacity causes flooding (most media).

Truth: This has never been cited as a cause of flooding in any of the Municipal Class EA's .. is it possible an advanced City that spends a million dollars per study missed this cause of 'aging'? Check out the Toronto program or Council reports and see if there is any example of 'aging' and share it with us.


****

More: Chestnut cracking on sewer infrastructure capacity.